That Pesky Little Detail: Data in an AI World

Bill Balint • February 27, 2025

A little cottage industry seemingly arises at the conclusion of each decade, joyously pointing out those long-since forgotten, failed techy items from the past 10 years that were supposed to impact the world but were miserable failures instead.


While we are only at the midpoint of the 2020s, it is safe to say AI will not be the next Google Glass, 3D television or the loads of other mainstays on the 2010s lists of IT infamy.


Higher education quickly realized both the potential AI positives and negatives as it applied to the teaching, learning and academic research space (think plagiarism on one hand matched against the prospect of personalized learning on the other). Underscoring this fact is the groundbreaking recent announcement that the California State University System intends to become the nation’s “first and largest AI-empowered university system” (https://www.calstate.edu/csu-system/news/Pages/CSU-AI-Powered-Initiative.aspx).


However, AI adoption for administrative tasks – providing desperately-needed help as struggling institutions look to lower costs, attract/retain more students, and obtain external support via fundraising, grants, etc. – has been a little more deliberate.


But this is changing fast, as it seems every higher education information system vendor is now flexing its AI muscles – or at least the sales and marketing teams are doing so. Phrases like ‘Throw your CRMs into the trash bin because mine innovates using AI’ or ‘I’ll see your legacy registration system and raise you a machine language course schedule wizard’ are lurking in that sea of PR if you read between the lines hard enough.


The fear of missing the AI train must be balanced because higher education cybersecurity and data privacy risks because AI requires data and that’s where things get complicated.


Higher education is always among the most vulnerable industries because its data is so valuable to cyber attackers, and it is considered an easy target. No industry has the combination of user churn, number of inexperienced and casual users, the plethora of personal devices, and an overriding culture of openness. Couple it with IT budgets and staffing often facing unprecedented challenges and it is a mix that attracts bad actors from across the globe. The increasing AI usage will likely bring even more frequent, more sophisticated attacks.


Adding to the complexity is the presence of shadow systems housing sensitive or confidential data lurking in higher education for some 40 years. Among the relevant examples are a power user downloading student fiscal data onto a personal hard drive, a researcher locally storing sensitive data, and an office which has deployed an information system for which the IT department does not even know exists.


Consider the dark possibilities if a user innocently exposes such data to a GenAI model.



This all means answers to traditional questions like ‘Where is the data actually stored and what security measures exist for that data both at rest and in transit?’ and ‘How robust are the tools restricting data access?’ deserve more scrutiny than ever.


Perhaps more importantly, the question of ‘Does my executive who listened to AI hype at a conference last week and is now eager to buy an AI-infused product fully grasp the potential risk?’ At one time, it may have taken a concerning cybersecurity audit finding to catch the attention of the institution’s board or cabinet. But these can no longer those times and executive recognition of AI risk up front is critical.


Executive leadership should prioritize the creation of practical, common-sense policies governing AI usage. Tactical and operational leadership needs empowered to keep those policies up to date and to make key decisions on tools and techniques to help keep data safe. They can then build appropriate procedures, guidelines, standards, FAQs, and best practices so users can effectively work in an emerging AI world.


Bill Balint is the owner of Haven Hill Services LLC, contracted as TriVigil’s Advisory CIO for Education.

By Bill Balint June 10, 2025
Higher Education IT professionals must be committed to taking care of others. After all, great IT organizations were never in the business of looking after computing but were always in the business of customer service. It is not about bits, bytes, clouds, anti-virus, border firewalls or even processing credit card payments online. The best IT organizations make it all about people. But we higher ed. IT people find ourselves in the middle of a disrupted industry and this disruption is not going away. In this case, it is not the disruption of GenAI, or data breaches run wild. Instead, it is about survival. The tragic Spring 2025 story of Limestone University in Gaffney, S.C. is yet another in a growing list of institutions no longer able to weather the ominous reality. Founded in 1845, 16 years before the Civil War erupted in Limestone’s home state, Limestone overcame every challenge of a small private institution for some 180 years. That is until April 29 when Limestone’s governing board officially announced its immediate closure. The announcement came after Limestone lost some 50 percent of its enrollment in the past decade, from about 3,200 students to 1,600. A large percentage of these are student athletes as the institution fielded 23 teams at the NCAA Division II level. The closure story is repeated often enough nationally that it sadly runs the risk of no longer being newsworthy. According to federal data provided to The Hechinger Report ( https://hechingerreport.org/tracking-college-closures/ ), 28 higher education institutions closed in the first nine (9) months of 2024 alone. What does this have to do with IT departments? Everything. From an IT perspective, many institutions rely on online learning, video conferencing, worker collaboration suites, CRMs, SaaS ERPs and SIS’, and comprehensive cybersecurity tools at levels that could not have even been dreamed about in the pre-COVID world. That’s not even addressing the emerging AI world, coupled with unfunded mandates from increasingly complex IT compliance requirements. More and more money is needed to attract and retain fewer and fewer potential students at many institutions and that IT budget may look like fertile ground. Not surprisingly, some view IT as a liability – like a very expensive utility bill – as higher education muddles through this dark time. Perhaps a necessary evil, but one that needs to operate as cheaply, as possible. True enough, IT brings significant expense money, and it generates very little direct revenue in most cases. The Good Ole’ Days of IT being directed to “do more with less” is being replaced with “we can do IT without you”. All of which leads back to the higher education IT professional and the mental health impact of this disruption that really dates to the 2008 recession when budgets and staffing levels took a negative turn from which some departments never recovered. Cybersecurity and data privacy professionals are arguably facing the highest stress levels in the organization. The Information Systems Audit and Control Association’s (ISACA) 2024 State of Cybersecurity survey report notes that 66 percent of cybersecurity staff believe their role is more stressful than it was five (5) years ago ( https://www.isaca.org/about-us/newsroom/press-releases/2024/nearly-two-thirds-of-cybersecurity-pros-say-job-stress-is-growing-according-to- new-isaca-research ). Though its focus is on the higher education ecosystem in general, 2025 EDUCAUSE Horizon Action Plan: Mental Health Supports ( https://library.educause.edu/-/media/files/library/2025/1/2025horizonactionplanmentalhealth.pdf ) offers some practical, common sense and sustainable tips for the IT professional, their team, the IT organization, and beyond, to help. Like most things in an IT organization, leadership – or lack thereof – is a key difference maker. A subtle action by a leader to prioritize staff mental health similar to the department’s larger goals of professional development, productivity gains or continuous improvement will make all goals easier to achieve. It is well established that mental health wellness leads to less workplace tension, better employee retention, and less time missed due to illness. But it is also simply the right thing to do because the disruption is disrupting IT employees like never before and it seems like the disruption is here to stay. Bill Balint is the owner of Haven Hill Services LLC, contracted as TriVigil’s Advisory CIO for Education.
By Bill Balint April 30, 2025
In a higher education world where cybersecurity, data protection and data privacy activities are bathed in multiple regulations, policies, procedures, standards and all the rest, what happens when victims claim, “compliance is just not good enough”? The answer can be quite costly. The March 2025 data breach incident at the Yale New Haven Health System (https://www.ynhhs.org/legal-notices) could potentially be such a case. Yale New Haven Health reported a data breach incident to the public on March 11, 2025, and a pair of 52-page federal lawsuits were filed on behalf of victims were already filed just over a month later. There are reports that as many as six additional suits were filed in the following days. A variety of law firms have created web pages where victims can seek legal engagement, so the number of suits could potentially increase. It does not appear Yale New Haven Health is being accused of specifically failing to meet a given governmental regulation – such as HIPAA, PCI, GLBA, or a state breach notification law. The fact that a generic notification letter about the incident can be found at the Massachusetts Office of the Attorney General website implies at least that state’s requirements have been met. But according to the Hartford Business Journal (https://www.hartfordbusiness.com/article/yale- new-haven-health-faces-lawsuits-over-data-breach-health-system-discloses-more-details), the suit claims Yale New Haven Health did not “…properly secure and safeguard Plaintiff ’s and Class Members’ sensitive personally identifiable information (PII) and personal health information (PHI), which, as a result, is now in criminal cyberthieves’ possession.” These lawsuits understandably infer that provider storing sensitive or confidential customer needs to use a portion of its revenue to fund customer data protection measures. The goal should be protecting data even beyond regulatory compliance demands. A Big Year For Settlements Beyond the question of governmental regulations and their relationship to lawsuits, there is no doubt higher education is suffering increased direct financial penalties resulting from data breaches. Just one example from 2025 is the $2 million settlement of the class action data breach lawsuit against St. Louis University and SSM Health Saint Louis University Hospital from mid-April, stemming from the data breach of up to 93,000 individuals (https://www.hipaajournal.com/saint- louis-university-data-breach-lawsuit-settlement/). Besides the common practice of receiving identity theft protection benefits, claimants can receive up to $2,500 in unreimbursed expenses resulting from the breach. St. Louis University and SSM Health Saint Louis University Hospital are not alone, as various similar suits are on schedule to be settled later in 2025. Large or small, public or private, no institution appears immune. Too Early? Too Late? Another new lawsuit is among those that confront the long-debated ”time to notify the victims” issue. Michael Harris, a potential incoming student at Lee University, filed the suit against Lee in the U.S. District Court Eastern District of Tennessee (https://www.local3news.com/local-news/lee-university-sued-for-negligence-after-data-breach-impacts-thousands/article_ca5ecb44- 8872-4692-9dd8-4ce35defe574.html). The lawsuit includes multiple complaints, among them is the claim that Lee waited for more than one year to notify the impacted individuals. One could argue notifying potential victims before all facts are known runs the risk of providing incomplete information. But waiting for an investigation to complete runs the risk of victims suffering the consequences of the breach without even knowing a breach of their information occurred. Damage Over Dollars? Of course, data breaches are often about a lot more than money. They hold the potential to devastate victims by inflicting non-economic temporary and sometimes even permanent damage. The recent takeover of the New York University (NYU) website by a hacker who briefly exposed NYU applicant information datasets back to 1989 (https://nyunews.com/news/2025/04/01/nyu-data-breach-lawsuits/) serves as a reminder. Public policy – often via regulation – tries to limit the damage by requiring those who house sensitive and confidential data adhere to strict standards. But higher education institutions need to know that compliance with all regulations and data breach laws might not be enough. These large settlements should provide institutions with a constant reminder. Bill Balint is the owner of Haven Hill Services LLC, contracted as Trivigil’s Advisory CIO for Education.
By Bill Balint April 15, 2025
TriVigil is dedicated to providing educational institutions with comprehensive cybersecurity solutions that harmonize people, policies, and technology. This commitment includes highlighting selected opportunities where cybersecurity and privacy professionals in the education sector can network, learn, meet with solutions providers and gain other insights. There are literally hundreds of cybersecurity and data privacy events – local, regional, national, international and virtual. Everything from a one-hour webinar to global large-scale events with thousands of attendees. Some are purely focused on cybersecurity and/or data privacy, while others list these as merely a sub-interest or track. Some emphasize the education sector, while others do not focus on any specific industry. Among the plethora of quality events blanketing every area of interest, TriVigil notes a pair of late spring 2025 events that include education as a specific focus. The 2025 Educause Cybersecurity and Privacy Professionals Conference will take place in Baltimore May 19-21 ( https://events.educause.edu/cybersecurity-and-privacy-professionals-conference/2025 ). It is perhaps higher education’s best-known event focused solely on these topics. This year’s “Stronger Connections for Stronger Protections” theme is evident in all five attendee tracks: · Awareness, Education, and Human Factors · Governance and Strategic Alignment · Transformational Leadership · Navigating Compliance with Confidence · Evolving Technologies and Practices With the emphasis on collaboration, it is fitting the 2025 conference is efficiently expanded such that a small increase in time spent onsite provides a large increase for attendee opportunities. The opening pre-conference workshop day remains from previous years (May 19), but the opening general session has been moved to the end of the first day, as well. This change allows for breakout sessions to begin immediately on the second day (May 20). The third day (May 21) has been extended to a full day agenda. May 19 opens with eight preconference workshops. These include two full-day, three morning half-day and three afternoon half-day options. Derrich Phillips, founder of Aspire Cyber and of the CMMC Professionals Network (CPN), provides the opening general session entitled “Beyond the Firewall: How Community Strengthens Cybersecurity in Higher Education”. May 20-21 should also be a treat as attendees can take advantage of 12 breakout session time slots, each 45 minutes in length. This is especially impressive as there are conferences twice as long that struggle to offer that many breakout session slots. Furthermore, the agenda also provides three separate times for attendees to take part in poster sessions. The conference concludes with a closing general session. Better than 45 breakout sessions spread across those 12 timeslots will be delivered in presentation and panel discussion formats by representatives from about 40 different institutions and some 20 solutions providers. Presenters and panelists from institutions span large R1 institutions and state system offices to small liberal arts schools, community colleges and those in between. 2025 NICE Conference and Expo The 2025 NICE Conference & Expo will take place in Denver on June 1-3, 2025 ( https://niceconference.org/ ). The conference touts itself as “… the annual convening of community members and thought leaders from education, government, industry, and non-profits to explore ways of developing a skilled cybersecurity workforce ready to meet the challenges of the future.” NICE itself is a program led by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), established by the Cybersecurity Enhancement Act of 2014. Florida International University is a conference co-host, further underscoring the important role of higher education at the event. New America, a non-profit think tank, serves as the conference’s other co-host. This year’s “Climbing Higher: Educating & Sustaining a Resilient Cybersecurity Workforce” theme would appear very relevant for a higher education sector challenged with talent acquisition and employee development. This is especially true with the internal cybersecurity workforce. The event opens with half-day afternoon workshops on June 1, with the conference running for two full days on June 2-3. Although the list of sessions is not available yet, a glance at the 2024 agenda indicated eight breakout session timeslots and five plenary slots in addition to the pre-conference workshops. Over 30 breakout sessions in 2024 were delivered by a mix of academia, government and industry representatives. Bill Balint is the owner of Haven Hill Services LLC, contracted as TriVigil’s Advisory CIO for Education.